The drama unfolds in Osun State as the suspension of Chief Judge Justice Adepele Ojo continues. Governor Ademola Adeleke denies appointing an acting CJ, adding to the confusion surrounding Ojo’s replacement.
The State Commissioner for Information clarifies that the governor notified the Chief Justice of Nigeria about the investigation and recommended an acting appointment.
Political parties, Osun APC and PDP, engage in a war of words over the handling of the CJ’s matter.
The Osun APC criticizes the governor, questioning his understanding of constitutional provisions, and raises concerns about the State House of Assembly’s actions.
The party implies a lack of public confidence in the Assembly, accusing some members of alleged misconduct.
In contrast, the Osun PDP supports Governor Adeleke and praises his competence in handling state matters.
The party commends the governor for communicating the development to the National Judicial Council (NJC) and expresses confidence in his leadership style.
The PDP accuses the Osun APC of lacking a deeper understanding of governance dynamics.
Amidst the controversy, Adeleke’s spokesman dismisses claims that the CJ’s issues stem from a specific judgment.
He refutes the notion that the governor’s refusal to protect the Chief Judge from probe led to the crisis.
The spokesman emphasizes the focus on accountability and due process in the state.
Meanwhile, the CJ’s counsel, Oladipo Olasope (SAN), raises concerns about the purported removal process, stating that due process was not followed.
Olasope is unaware of any pending petitions against the CJ and refrains from commenting on the allegations.
The unfolding events highlight the complex and contentious nature of the situation, with political parties, legal representatives, and government officials offering different perspectives on the suspension of the Osun State Chief Judge.
